HOLY COMPARISONS, BATMAN!
So, there I was; quietly enjoying a cup of Stone's Bitter Chocolate Oatmeal Stout, when my buddy, Patrick, decides he wants to throw down ... "Just saw THE DARK KNIGHT," he says, "and I think Batman is George Bush." WHAT!? I couldn't have heard that correctly. "In fact," he goes on, "that whole movie is just a Republican wet dream." I'm literally too stunned to speak. I don't think he really understands what he's saying. I mean, telling me that Bush is under that cape and cowl is like telling a little kid that Elmo is really the Bogeyman; I simply refuse to be bated into this discussion.
But Patrick is persistent. He goes on to -- I'll reluctantly admit -- make a strong case: Bruce Wayne is just a rich, white guy who will do whatever it takes to catch the evil-doer terrorist killer (that would be the Joker). And to get the job done, he will even break a few laws if necessary. For example, using cell phone technology to spy on every citizen of Gotham is perfectly acceptable behavior for Mr. Wayne, and utilizing a little bit of torture to extract information from your enemy is just a necessary means to an end. Sound familiar?
Okay, okay, stop; I can't take it anymore! My tiny mind just can't wrap itself around this argument. I've been a loyal fan of Batman since as long as I can remember. I know Batman, and you, Mr. Bush, are no Batman. Yes, it's true that Batman is what they call an "antihero;" unlike boy scouts like Superman, he constantly walks a fine line between right and wrong. And quite frankly, I'm happy that this movie tackles the kinds of issues relevant to our society. Good movies do that. I also think it's a good thing that Batman faces moral dilemmas and is pushed to do bad things. That's what makes him -- and all of us -- interesting people. But is he Bush? Let's discuss ...
Here's the thing: Bruce Wayne becomes Batman because his parents were killed by a thug. As a result of this traumatic experience from his childhood, he chooses to devote his life to fighting crime. Unlike certain presidents, however, he has a strict moral code that he always follows. First, he never uses a gun (no shooting your friends in the face for this guy). Second, he never kills under any circumstances. Can Captain Death Penalty say that?
You want to compare the Joker to Osama. Fine, let's do that ... When the Joker kills hundreds of people for no reason, Batman doesn't try to convince Gotham that the Penguin actually did it. But that is exactly what Bush did when he duped this country into believing that Iraq was responsible for 9/11. For those who STILL don't believe Mr. Bush actually wanted to do that, then maybe you should read Pulitzer prize winning journalist Ron Suskind's new book "The Way of the World." Here's a part of what Mr. Suskind wrote for The Huffington Post ...
The Iraq Intelligence Chief, Tahir Jalil Habbush -- a man still carrying a $1 million reward for capture, the Jack of Diamonds in Bush's famous deck of wanted men -- has been America's secret source on Iraq. Starting in January of 2003, with Blair and Bush watching, his secret reports began to flow to officials on both sides of the Atlantic, saying that there were no WMD and that Hussein was acting so odd because of fear that the Iranians would find out he was a toothless tiger. The U.S. deep-sixed the intelligence report in February, "resettled" Habbush to a safe house in Jordan during the invasion and then paid him $5 million in what could only be considered hush money.
In the fall of 2003, after the world learned there were no WMD -- as Habbush had foretold -- the White House ordered the CIA to carry out a deception. The mission: create a handwritten letter, dated July, 2001, from Habbush to Saddam saying that Atta trained in Iraq before the attacks and the Saddam was buying yellow cake for Niger with help from a "small team from the al Qaeda organization."
Hmm, very un-Batman-like behavior if you ask me. See, unlike Bush, Batman doesn't want to manipulate the public for his own questionable ends; he just wants to catch the actual bad guys. What, on the other hand, motivates W.: money, power, oil, greed? Hard to say. And as for the spying thing, we all know that Batman blows up the surveillance equipment at the end of the movie, because even he understands that it is "too much power for one person." Does anyone believe for a second that Bush would ever come to that same conclusion?
So, Batman and Bush are the same? No, Batman is the man in black who's devoted his life to the betterment of society. He fights for the downtrodden and struggles against corrupt government and corporate officials. He has no selfish motive other than to try and make the world a better place for all of us. Yes, Virginia, there is a Batman ... and his name is Obama.
Labels: batman, george w. bush
7 Comments:
First!
That's right, the fascist neo-cons own the movie business too.
P.S.: I don't mind being bated, but I sure hate being baited. (You can edit that last part if you want ;)
No way in Gotham that Batman = Bush & The Evil Adminstration.
Hey, did you hear that Joss Whedon is holding a fundraiser for McCain?
And then TL's head exploded...
TL, you convinced me. Batman is not Bush. The Dark Knight does not represent the neocon reality. Rather, it represents the neocon comic book fantasy of the world and the role of the neocon hero in it. In this fantasy, rich white American guys must go outside the laws in order to defeat the bad guys, regardless of our civilized sensibilities and lefty pieties. “I am not your hero. I am the hero you need,” Batman says, or something to that effect. That’s what makes him the Dark Knight, and that’s what makes the movie interesting.
You can point out how the neocon reality does not measure up to the neocon fantasy, how Bush is not Batman. You can cite chapter and verse about motivations and deeds that demonstrate how Bush is not Batman. You’d have a lot of evidence at your disposal. I’d support all your efforts to point out the truth about neocon deceptions and motivations. But your efforts to distinguish a man from a comic book hero is irrelevant to the film.
The Dark Knight is not history, not journalism. It is a comic book fantasy, a blockbuster summer movie. It works on an aesthetic level, not a rational one. Its truth is emotional. It pulls us into the emotional world of the Dark Knight, which is a neocon emotional world. As viewers of the film, we root for a rich white vigilante who tortures bad guys and spies on Americans. His moral qualms, his awareness that his moral code is on the dark side, his humanity, make us root for him all the more. Because it is recognizably human, we enter more fully into the neocon emotional world.
I don’t mean to spoil all your fun. I’m not arguing that those of us who trek left should completely write off Batman or The Dark Knight. One could argue—indeed, I was waiting for you to argue--that Christopher Nolan has achieved something pretty special. On the grand stage of a summer blockbuster, in the thinly veiled guise of a comic book tale, he succeeds in holding up a mirror to post-911 America. It’s not a pretty image. Gotham has been attacked. Americans are afraid. Those claiming to protect us are operating outside the law. As lefties, we can ask how this came to pass. How have we come to live in a neocon America?
The Dark Knight is especially interesting because it poses this typical question in an atypical way. Rather than Huffington Post-style rational discussion of right-wing media control, big-oil motivation, or CIA conspiracies, the movie poses an emotional question. Why is Batman’s rogue vigilantism so emotionally appealing to so many Americans? If we lefties are tempted to respond by dismissing the emotional make-up of ignorant red-state Americans, we might dare to face a more personal question. Why is the Batman vigilante narrative so appealing to us?
Edgar - Oops, I sat there with bated breath waiting to be baited into this discussion of my mistake :)
George - You are now Dr. Horrible.
UPDATE - During my debate with Patrick, I said that director Christopher Nolan had already discussed the "Bush is Batman" thing and said that his Batman was really modelled after a different leader ... but I couldn't remember who.
Last night I watched The History Channel's "Batman Unmasked: The Psychology of the Dark Knight," and Nolan said his version of Bruce Wayne is sort of Teddy Roosevelt. Go figure?
Did anyone else notice that Laura Bush during the Beijing opening ceremonies looked just like the Jack Nicholson Joker character? Her face was constantly locked in a fake-looking smile.
Post a Comment
<< Home